Sep 11 2008

Shemila

Podcast: The Chinese community newspaper and its effects on the community

Posted at 3:12 pm under Podcast




Exegesis

      Ethnic-language media is one of the most important elements in the lives of international students, long-term travelers and both old and new migrants in their new host country. According to Zhou et al., publications is placed in a dominant position among various media forms in ethnic-language media (2006, p.52). Community newspapers actually provide a source for these ‘foreign’ people to gather informations on different aspect of life, ranging from news to suggestions for dinner. This audio project aims to examine how one of the most widely circulated community newspaper, Australia Asia Business Weekly (formerly Asia Times), contribute to the Chinese community in Perth, as well as the experience of participating in such publication.

      As a small-scale community weekly, it allows the participation of non/semi-professional people, such as students, in the production process. The interviewee in the podcast is one of them. In this case, a supposed-to-be consumer becomes a producer. Reporters can decide what they want to cover in some of the pages apart from hard news, with the approval of the editor at the end, but they do have the power to determine their own focus of stories that they are writing. Though the top down relationship of producer and audiences still exist, but the hierarchy is being relaxed.

      As mentioned in the project, both the reporter (interviewee) and readers have a feel of home and sense of belonging to the community by writing and reading the weekly. Chavis argues the ‘sense of community’ or identity is more important to a community than physical locality (cited by Gooch, 2008, p.19). The Chinese community has the advantage of living in the same area, and the sense of belonging created by the newspaper enhances the ‘social bond’ among the community. The ‘social bond’ (2002) suggested by Jenkins has being intensified by the internet. Unlike the internet, the community newspaper does not provide immediate access and speedy interactions between readers, but the ‘social bond’ still has developed within the community. The community has formed their own ‘ethnic networks to find housing, jobs and their way around’ (Zhou et al., 2006, p.67).

      In addition, the community newspaper creates linkage between the diasporians and their homeland. The Chinese newspaper emphasizes particularly on news in China and other Southeast Asian region, so it ‘keeps immigrants in close contact with the homeland, thus easing the psychological and emotional problems of being a foreigner’ (Zhou et al., 2006, p.69). Once again it creates a ‘sense of community’ (Gooch, 2008, p.19) to the Chinese people in Perth, but this time with the people in their homeland, especially friends and relatives. Although people staying in different localities cannot conduct immediate conversations through the newspaper, still it brings forth a sense of community which transcends geographical locations.

      This audio project is produced in the form of a podcast and supposedly being uploaded to a blog, which people can browse freely while they surf the World Wide Web. The circulation of newspaper is limited to physical locality as readers have to show up at the distribution point to get copies, as well as promotion of the paper is greatly limited to mouth-to-mouth transfer. Like fandom before the emergence of internet, it is a ‘week-end only world’ (2002), as Jenkins suggests. However, since the World Wide Web gives ‘a surprising degree of public visibility’ (ibid.) to its contents, the efficiency of promotion will be rocketed if it is publicised through the internet, allowing more people to acknowledge its presence and advantages brought to the community. Sadly, the newspaper remains as a ‘week-end only world’, since the newspaper is published once a week, and still being limited to its physical distribution.

      Apart from how the contents of the podcast engage in participatory culture, as mentioned above, the podcast is being uploaded to the internet so that people with the connection would have the chance of approaching it. That means the person who creates and uploads the podcast, which is me, has also engaged in participatory culture. Dery describes ‘all forms of DIY (Do-It-Yourself) media as “jamming”’ (Cited by Jenkins, 2002). The podcast jammed the Australian and Chinese culture together as it talks about Chinese community newspaper in Perth.

      In conclusion, this audio project attempts to examine how a supposed-to-be consumer tries to participate in community newspaper publication and how the community newspaper contributes to the Chinese community in Perth. The hierarchy of small-scale community newspaper is relaxed due to the employment of students as volunteer reporters. The newspaper creates a better sense of community to both producers and consumers. Moreover, the podcast itself helps to inform people on the existence of such community newspaper through a much efficient way of publicizing, the World Wide Web. Last but not least, the podcast is also a cultural product engaged in participatory culture.

The Podcast

audio-project-shemila-cheng [4:22]

Bibliography

Gooch, Betsy (2008) ‘The Communication of Fan Culture: The Impact of New Media on Science Fiction and Fantasy Fandom.’ http://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/1853/21818/1/gooch_betsy_r_200805_ro.pdf (accessed 8 September 2008)

Jenkins, Henry (2002) ‘Interactive Audiences? The “Collective Intelligence” of Media Fans’, in Dan Harries, ed., The New Media Book. London: British Film Institute, pp.157-170.

Zhou, Min, Wenhong Chen and Guoxuan Cai (2006) ‘Chinese-language media and immigrant life in the United States and Canada’, Wanning Sun, ed., Media and the Chinese Diaspora: Community, Communications and Commerce, New York: Routledge, pp.42-74.

2 responses so far


Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

2 Responses to “Podcast: The Chinese community newspaper and its effects on the community”

  1.   jhfsamon 17 Sep 2008 at 3:06 pm 1

    Like Alex, Shemila’s podcast also demonstrates participatory cultureand community in a small-scale medium (the newspaper) and ethnic group(the Chinese). Participatory culture is also evident in this communitynewspaper through the “participation of non/semi-professional people,such as students” during its production process. The “top-down”relationship is less evident here as they are allowed to writewhatever they wish. It is obvious here that the community focused on is the Chinese community.

    Unlike Alex’s community radio which targets several ethnicgroups, the sense of community might be more apparent as it caters toonly the Chinese in Perth. By incorporating overseas Chinese news, the sense of Chinese identity is further exemplified in this Western society. Just as radio community has its limitations, so does this newspaper community. As it is a ‘week-end only world’ it would definitely rely on word of mouth to ensure its continuity. Moreover,the ability of the newspaper community to survive in the digital ageis questioned. Most newspapers have two mediums – online and paper form. However this Chinese newspaper only has the paper form medium.What should be done in order to ensure that this small niche group continues to support the Chinese newspaper? Perhaps going online wouldbe increase the amount of participatory culture. It might not need to involve much funding as there are free sites in which these newspapercan be hosted online, such as Blogspot.

    The podcast demonstrates the presenter who feels part of the Chinese community and how the newspaper Chinese community actually benefits in bringing oversea Chinese together. I think the message from the podcast would have been more effective if the interviewee had spoken in a less monotonous manner. Moreover, there was a little bit of ‘air’ as, perhaps, the interviewee spoke too close to the microphone.Overall, it was an effective presentation.

  2.   stopheron 18 Sep 2008 at 3:12 pm 2

    This podcast deals with issues of community in a highly competent, upfront manner, in that it’s about a community newspaper, and can be looked at with notions and theories of participatory culture in mind to give a comprehensive picture of the place this newspaper has in its community. From a technical point of view, it has crisp music well mixed, as well as a good take on the podcast format, in that in the world created by the podcast, it is a part of a series, that seems to link back to ideas all related to ideas of participatory culture. Unfortunately there are a couple of pops and whistles that at times become more audible than the words behind them, but on the whole the production is great.

    The place of this newspaper in the Chinese community of Perth is evident based on the attitudes of both the interviewer and interviewee. Through a number of its traits it helps to foster a sense of community amongst its readers – that it is written in Chinese makes it only available to those who can read Chinese, for instance. Of the people in Perth who do read Chinese, the bulk would be of Chinese heritage, and thus they are able to unite around the paper. On the flip side of the language aspect, that it is written in Chinese makes it accessible to those Chinese whose command of English isn’t necessarily adequate to read newspapers written in English, thus making these people more empowered and knowledgeable about the world in a city that doesn’t cater to their information needs. The podcast very quickly and strongly makes this point. Furthermore, through the podcast a listener comes to learn that the content of the paper is itself particularly suited to Chinese, in that it talks about issues relating to China, and carries advertisements for housing, good restaurants and the like. Even its distribution is well suited to its audience, being available in Chinese restaurants, presumably places where its audience are likely to go. To reiterate, these are all traits that the podcast speaks of in a clear manner.

    To tie it to readings related to participatory culture, we can look at the means of its production. Most contributors are at best semi-professional, in the example of the interviewee, a student interested in the field of journalism. This shows the paper to be created by its audience, a trait of productions made in a participatory spirit.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.